Frequently Asked Questions

Select a FOA to view questions and answers for the specific funding opportunity. Alternatively select "Non-FOA related items" to view system FAQ items.

Question 1: The link for the "Full Announcement" does not work for the following FOA. SunShot Solar Energy Evolution and Diffusion Studies (SEEDS) http://www.grants.gov/search/announce.do;jsessionid=TDjpPhMXT9s6f4vFnKggb25rG8VZBLLVKgJy2SWQpGDWhT4NWVRz!-668392920
Answer 1:

As stated in the Grants.gov description, the full Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) is posted on the EERE Exchange website at https://eere-exchange.energy.gov.  Please visit EERE Exchange to download the FOA.

Question 2: I have an idea for solar canopies on buildings to incorporate new technology to fit in with the original beauty and functionality of old buildings. I have no experience in solar energy, how little and how much do I need to propose to know if this is a feasible idea for the program? I had filled out a form and then lost it, but I will try again on another date. I have two good ideas though for solar access and aesthetics.
Answer 2:

The purpose of the SEEDS Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) is to fund studies on technology evolution or diffusion, in order to develop practicable business or policy recommendations for the solar industry.  This FOA will not fund research on specific solar canopy designs.  To find a FOA more suited to your specific ideas, please visit www.grants.gov and click on “Find Funding Opportunities”.

Question 3: Are behavioral studies part of the SEEDS FOA?
Answer 3:

Access to and manipulation of datasets will be a key determinant of the success of studies in solar technology evolution and diffusion. The researchers involved in such a data-driven exercise should be versed in social, behavioral, and economic sciences.  As such, DOE is encouraging interdisciplinary efforts, including both traditional and computational social scientists, to propose projects under SEEDS.  Namely, Team Structure 2 calls to include "for example, physical scientists, computer scientists, social scientists, and policy experts."  Team Structure 3 calls for "advancements in applications of complexity science and behavioral economics."  Applicants are to select appropriate methods, drawn from the interface of the social sciences and natural sciences, that precisely reflect the questions at hand.

Question 4: I have begun working on the SEEDS grant; I have recently sent away for support, and this is what I have so far, if you could look it over and give me any information in regards, I would appreciate it.
Answer 4:

Thank you for your interest in the requirements of the SEEDS Funding Opportunity Announcement.  The FOA posted at the EERE eXCHANGE website is comprehensive and designed to allow prospective applicants to assess their proposed projects versus the requirements and criteria of the FOA.  The SEEDS FOA is a competitive announcement and private discussions with DOE regarding prospective applications, while the announcement is open, are prohibited.  DOE cannot predetermine the suitability or viability of a proposal in advance of the merit review process.  It is up to prospective applicants to review the requirements of the FOA and assess the merits of their proposed project to determine whether to submit an application. 

Question 5: We are planning to submit an application for the SEEDS FOA (DE-FOA-0000740). The cost sharing language in the announcement says that institutions of higher education are eligible for a cost share waiver. When providing funding information, do we assume we will NOT be responsible for 20% cost share (otherwise do we put total funding needs under federal funding)? If so, would this work against us? Thank you.
Answer 5:

Applicants and sub-recipients under the SEEDS FOA that are Institutions of Higher Education, non-profit organizations, national laboratories, or DOE Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs) may waive the 20% cost share requirement.   In this case, total funding needs should be reflected in the Federal funding column of the SF-424A budget.    

 Utilizing the cost share waiver will not negatively impact applicants that are eligible for the waiver.  Applications will be reviewed using the Full Application Merit Review Criteria set forth in Section V.A.3 of the FOA, as well as the program policy factors in Section V.A.4.

Question 6: In reference to the section on recipients and sub-recipients NOT eligible for the cost share waiver, does this mean each recipient or sub-recipient on a team must provide a 20% cost share, or can the 20% cost share be met by the team as a whole with some members providing more than 20%?
Answer 6: If none of the recipients or sub-recipients on an application are eligible for the cost share waiver, the cost share requirement is 20% of total project costs.  Some team members may provide more or less than 20%, as long as the team as a whole meets the 20% cost share requirement overall.
Question 7: Will the merit review be done by DOE employees or will outside reviewers from the national labs or industry be used?
Answer 7: The merit reviewers can be a combination of federal and non-federal individuals.  Please review Section III-Merit Reviewer Guidelines of the Merit Review Guide for Federal Assistance at http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/meritrev.pdf for more details.
Question 8: What protections are provided for the intellectual property embedded in the concept papers and final applications?
Answer 8:

DOE will use data and other information contained in applications strictly for evaluation purposes. Applicants should not include confidential, proprietary, or privileged information in their applications unless such information is necessary to convey an understanding of the proposed project.   Applications containing confidential, proprietary, or privileged information must be marked as described in Section VIII.D of the FOA.

Question 9: What were the ways that the Feb. 17 workshop in Berkeley was announced to those interested? Could you send us the written notes or records from the meeting and the list of participants? I am particularly interested in this statement, "Overview RECOMMENDATION 4-4: DOE, along with NSF, should initiate a multidisciplinary social science research program to examine the U.S. energy technology innovation ecosystem, including its actors, functions, processes, and outcomes..." Source: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/eere_advisory_committee/pdfs/erac_sunshot_041812.pdf, slide 43 of 53. and: http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/SunShot_SEAB_Presentation_1-31-12.pdf
Answer 9:

The workshop was announced on the SunShot homepage and via the DOE solar program's email newsletter.  All documents relating to the workshop can be found on the SunShot webpage, at www.solar.energy.gov/sunshot/past_workshops.html#adlucem. The key determinations from the workshop are described within the FOA document, in Section I.C. 

The slide referenced in your question was prepared by the SunShot leadership when describing the workshop; it was not used in any of the workshop material, the RFI, or the FOA.  This was a direct recommendation by the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST): http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-energy-tech-report.pdf.

Question 10: As I understand it, a University qualifies for a cost share waiver – however, in the online application system, every time the application is saved it gives a warning in red saying “The following items must be resolved before saving: Application requires applicants to contribute at least 20% of the total project cost. Please enter a cost share that is at least 20% of the total project cost.” How do we workaround this issue?
Answer 10:

In order to apply the cost share waiver, you must check the box “I certify that I have reviewed the Funding Opportunity Announcement, and this application is compliant with the cost share requirements”.  This box is located on the Funds and Costs tab of the Exchange application.

Question 11: Would the Solar Energy Evolution and Diffusion Studies (SEEDS) be sufficiently broad enough to include solar thermal R&D and commercialization or is this strictly a PV opportunity?
Answer 11:

The SEEDS FOA is sufficiently broad to include any solar technology, however, as stated in Q&A #2, the purpose of the FOA is to fund studies on technology evolution or diffusion, in order to develop practicable business or policy recommendations for the solar industry.  Funding for research or commercialization of specific technologies is not within the scope of this FOA.  Rather, this FOA seeks to fund research on the social, behavioral, or economic patterns that spur more rapid commercialization or faster market adoption of solar technologies.

Question 12: Do non-profit organizations qualify for this funding under this funding opportunity?
Answer 12:

Yes, non-profit domestic entities are eligible to apply as prime recipients and sub-recipients for this announcement.  See Section III.A for other types of entities that are eligible to apply to this FOA.

Question 13: Is DOE interested in funding scalability research (such as on materials resource constraints) under this FOA? Answer: The main motivations for SEEDS research is on solar energy technology market dynamics and solar technological progress. Proposals which emphasize results with clear and practicable business or policy implications for accelerating diffusion or accelerating reductions in technology costs will be considered.
Answer 13:

The main motivations for SEEDS research is on solar energy technology market dynamics and solar technological progress.  Proposals which emphasize results with clear and practicable business or policy implications for accelerating diffusion or accelerating reductions in technology costs will be considered.

Question 14: Q1: As a private company applying to the program in hopes of hiring a researcher to partner with us on a project of our own design, are we still eligible to submit a concept paper for Team Structure 1? At what point in the application process will it be necessary to have chosen a researcher committed to the project (vs. a short list of qualified persons, or a detailed hiring announcement with requisite qualifications, etc.)? Is the SunShot program interested in connecting a qualified researcher to proposed projects? Q2: As a private company proposing a combined research project/new industry tool in response to the FOA, what concerns does the SunShot program have over any future profits that result from the project, information gleaned from the project, or tools developed during the project? What are reasonable limits, timelines, etc. for reconciling a profit-making company with the market access and data necessary solar industry research?
Answer 14:

A1: 

Applicants are responsible for forming their own partnerships / affiliations prior to applying to the FOA.  For Team Structure 1, the researcher and host entity must be identified prior to submitting a full application.  The Full Application deadline is 9/17/2012 at 5:00PM Eastern, however, applicants must submit a Concept Paper by 7/13/2012 at 5:00PM Eastern in order to be eligible to submit a Full Application.  If you are not able to identify a researcher prior to the Concept Paper deadline, you may still submit a Concept Paper, however, your submission risks scoring lower on the “Ability of applicant(s) to accomplish proposed project activities” criterion (see Section V.A. of the FOA for Review Criteria).

 

Although the FOA does not expressly prohibit for-profit companies from applying as the prime applicant under Team Structure 1, the intent of that team structure was for DOE to support a researcher as the prime applicant, with the for-profit company, non-profit organization, electricity provider, or governmental entity serving as a host to the project by providing access to data sets.  As stated in the Team Structure 1 description, “the scholar may act as an informal advisor to the host but will maintain an independent status”.  The reason for this is that Team Structure 1’s key objective is to perform research on solar technology evolution and diffusion that will be openly published rather than remaining proprietary.  The merit review criteria (see Section V.A.3) include “Likelihood that the proposed approach can be expected to scale and impact the broader solar industry” and “Extent to which proposed methods and results provide generalizable lessons on technology evolution and diffusion that can be applied as new technologies are developed and deployed”, so for-profit companies applying as the prime recipient under Team Structure 1 will need to demonstrate that the scholar-in-residence’s insights /recommendations will be disseminated in a way that is beneficial to the solar industry as a whole.

 

A2: 

Per 10 CFR 600.318, grants and cooperative agreements may not provide for the payment of fee or profit to recipients or sub recipients during the award project period.  After the award has ended, there is no restriction against fee or profit. 

 

For guidance on tools or information developed during the project, please refer to Section VIII.F of the FOA, which states that data first-produced under the award that would be trade secret, or commercial or financial information that is privileged or confidential will be protected from public disclosure for a period of up to 5 years from the date of its development.   This means that the government will not disclose the data for up to 5 years, but the same restriction does not apply to the researcher(s) who produced the data during the award.  Recipient teams are responsible for negotiating and executing their own non-disclosure agreements.

 

Question 15: We are applying via Team Structure 2: SunShot SEEDS Research Team and the lead organization will either be a U.S. National Lab or a U.S. Academic Institution. We have reviewed questions 1 - 9 on the FAQ for this FOA on the eXCHANGE site and have additional questions regarding the 20% cost-share in addition to those already posted. If the waiver applies to the primary applicant as described above, are the other team members and sub-recipients also eligible for a waiver? Or, will they have to bring their own funds to the effort? In particular, some of our team members are individuals/scientists while others are part of a small consulting company. What would their financial responsibilities / cost-share be as described under the DE-FOA-0000740?
Answer 15:

Only Institutions of Higher Education, non-profit organizations, national laboratories, or DOE Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs) are eligible for the cost share waiver.   If the prime recipient is eligible for the waiver, but a sub-recipient is not, the sub-recipient is responsible for providing 20% cost share on their portion of the project.

Question 16: What documentation is required for the concept paper submission?
Answer 16:

The required components of the Concept Paper are:

·         Project Concept (3 page maximum)

·         Qualifications and Resources (2 page maximum)

·         Letter(s) of support (1 page maximum per letter)

Please review  Section IV.C of the FOA for further information.  

Question 17: In what form should the Applicant do the Contribution?
Answer 17:

The cumulative total of cost share contributions should be reflected in Section A-Budget Summary of the SF-424a.  The total should be in  Non-Federal column (d).  The listing of individual cost share contributions should be reflected on the cost share tab of the PMC 123.1 Budget Justification form.  Cost share may be composed of cash, in-kind contributions, or a combination of both.

Question 18: Can company facilities, equipment, IP, workforce be considered as a contribution?
Answer 18:

Please review the following sections of 10 CFR 600 and the applicable cost principles for information on what types of contributions are allowable as cost share:

·         For Universities / Non-profits: 10 CFR 600.123 & 2 CFR 220 Cost Principles for Educational Institutions / 2 CFR 230 Cost Principles for Nonprofit Organizations

·         For States / Local Governments: 10 CFR 600.224 & PART 225—Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments (OMB Circular A–87)

·         For Commercial Entities: 10 CFR 600.313 & FAR Subpart 31.2—Contracts with Commercial Organizations

Question 19: When should the applicant’s company contribute to the project company’s share?
Answer 19: Ideally, the cost share ratio will be maintained for every dollar spent on the project.  For example, if the cost share is 20% recipient, 80% DOE, then a charge of $1,000 to the project would be paid by $800 of DOE funds and $200 of recipient funds.   In practice, however, a recipient will be considered compliant with the cost share requirements as long as the cost share ratio is reached by the end of each reporting period (typically each quarter).
Question 20: How is the total amount of project cost determined?
Answer 20:

For applicants subject to the 20% cost share requirement, divide the requested DOE share by 80% to calculate the Total Project Cost.  For applicants eligible for a cost share waiver, the Total Project Cost is the sum of the requested DOE share and any cost share provided.  Please refer to Section III.B and Appendix C of the FOA for further details.

Question 21: What is the minimum/maximum project cost amount?
Answer 21:

The estimated maximum award size is $2.5 million. There is no minimum award size.  Please refer to Section II.C of the FOA.

Question 22: When should we expect to receive feedback on our submitted concept paper? Will we receive actual scores and/or comments, or simply an encouragement/discouragement to submit the full application?
Answer 22: DOE anticipates notifying concept paper applicants of encourage or discourage decisions in early- to mid-August.  All concept paper applicants will receive comments on the strengths and weaknesses of their proposal.
Question 23: How many Concept papers can be submitted by a leading University?
Answer 23:

DOE does not set limitations on the number of Concept Papers that can be submitted by an entity, however each concept paper must be submitted as an separate application.

Question 24: As a non-profit, do I still need to obtain a DUNS number for the organization? I tried to do so on the DUNS registration website but was unable to, I believe because it only applied to for-profit businesses.
Answer 24:

A DUNS number is necessary for all entities seeking an award with the Department of Energy.  DOE cannot make an award to an entity without a DUNS number.  DUNS numbers are available to all entities, not just for-profit businesses.  If you are having trouble requesting a DUNS number, please email govt@dnb.com for assistance.

Question 25: Upon reviewing the concept paper, DOE will either encourage or discourage us from filing the full application. What is your estimated time frame for notifying us of this?
Answer 25: DOE anticipates notifying concept paper applicants of encourage or discourage decisions in early- to mid-August.
Question 26: I understand that receiving the grant includes a 20% cost share requirement but that non-profits can apply for a waiver of this. How do I apply for this waiver?
Answer 26: In order to apply the cost share waiver, you must check the box “I certify that I have reviewed the Funding Opportunity Announcement, and this application is compliant with the cost share requirements”.  This box is located on the Funds and Costs tab of the Exchange application.
Question 27: Can we have until the full application deadline to edit the abstract?
Answer 27:

Yes, the Project Summary/Abstract File is a required document for the full application content, so you may make edits up until the full application deadline of 9/17/2012 at 5:00PM Eastern Time.

Question 28: The SEEDS FOA has a unique sentence about cost share that we would like to make sure we understand before we go much further. We are an FFRDC and are the prime recipient on this proposal. Our team is made up of universities, non-profit, and for-profit companies. There is a sentence in the SEEDS FOA that says “Recipients and sub-recipients not eligible for the cost share waiver as defined above must provide at least 20% of that recipient or sub-recipient’s allowable project costs…”. Usually the partners have to cover 20% of the TOTAL project costs, meaning the 20% cost share dollar amount needs to be a dollar amount big enough to cover the entire project costs, not just their specific institution’s costs but the total project costs. This sentence leads us to believe the universities and for-profit companies only need to cover 20% of their specific institution’s costs, and the FFRDCs and non-profits will provide no cost share because of the cost share waiver. Do we have this correct? Is it correct that the universities and for-profit companies only need to provide 20% cost share on their specific institution’s costs rather than the TOTAL project costs?
Answer 28:

Recipients and sub-recipients that are Institutions of Higher Education, non-profit organizations, national laboratories, or DOE Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDC) funded under this FOA are eligible for a waiver of the 20% cost share requirement.   Cost share for the portion of budget associated with the non-profit organizations, national laboratories, or FFRDC can be waived.

 

Recipients and sub-recipients not eligible for the cost share waiver as defined above must provide at least 20% of that recipient or sub-recipient’s allowable project costs (i.e., the sum of the Government share and the recipient share of allowable costs equals the allowable cost of the project) which must come from non-Federal sources unless otherwise allowed by law (see also Appendix C titled “Cost Share Information”).

 

Question 29: Will you please let me know if this funding opportunity is closed for concept paper submission? I read the due date was 07/13/2012. I wonder if there is any chance that we can submit the concept paper yet. Thanks for your help!
Answer 29:

Unfortunately, the date for Concept Paper submission for this funding opportunity has passed.   There is no opportunity to submit a concept paper after the 07/13/2012 due date.

Question 30: Our team of inventors, scientists, private small business and non-profit have developed a renewable hybrid green energy product with patent pending. We are starting to learn about your funding opportunities. The Sunshot SEEDS Energy program sounds exactly like the type of collaboration that is beneficial to all. I see that the deadline for concept papers is 7/13/12 and the full application by 9/17/12. I see that concept papers must be submitted. Do you foresee an opportunity for submittal for this grant or similar upcoming grants in this category? We would appreciate some guidance in getting started with your program. Thank you.
Answer 30:

Unfortunately, the concept paper deadline for the SEEDS funding opportunity announcement (FOA) has now passed, and only applicants that submitted a concept paper are eligible to submit a full application. 

To search for similar FOAs, please check the Grants.gov website at  www.grants.gov periodically.  As DOE cannot release information about upcoming FOAs until they are publically posted, the best way to learn about new FOAs that meet your organization’s needs is to sign up for automatic notifications through www.grants.gov.  Simply visit the “For Applicants” section, then click “Find Grant Opportunities” and “Email Subscription”.

Question 31: When will we be notified of Concept Paper review recommendation?
Answer 31:

Concept Paper feedback was posted on August 6, 2012.  After logging in to Exchange, please scroll to the bottom of your application record to view the strengths and weaknesses identified in your concept paper submission.

 

Question 32: We received an "encouraged" response to the concept paper that we submitted in response to DE-FOA-0000740: SOLAR ENERGY EVOLUTION AND DIFFUSION STUDIES (SEEDS). We have some follow-up questions about the comments that we received that are specific to our submission. Is there an appropriate contact point for a follow-up discussion regarding these comments?
Answer 32:

The SEEDS FOA is a competitive announcement and private discussions with DOE regarding prospective applications, while the announcement is open, are prohibited.

 

 

Question 33: Suppose that the award recipient is exempt from cost share, but at some point decides to subcontract a small piece of the work. Does this subcontract need to be cost shared, or does cost share requirement only apply to the recipients and subrecipients of the award?
Answer 33:

The cost share requirement applies to both recipients and subrecipients of the award.  Vendors are not required to provide cost share.  If an award recipient desires at some point to subcontract a small piece of work, the recipient must obtain prior approval from the Contracting Officer, as stated in 10 CFR 600.125(c)(8); 10 CFR 600.230(d)(4); and 10 CFR 600.315(c)(6).

 

 

Question 34: There seems to be a contradiction in the instructions in the FOA and in the SOPO document regarding how one divides a 3-year project plan into budget periods. According to the FOA (page 18), budget periods (with no-go decisions in between) are 1 year long. According to the SOPO instructions, a three-year project should be divided into two 18-month performance periods. Which is correct, or are they referring to different things?
Answer 34:

Please follow the guidance provided in Section II.F of the FOA, which states that all budget periods, regardless of project period length, should be approximately 1-year in duration.

 

 

Question 35: What is the mechanism to allow multiple PIs for the SEEDS proposal? The eere-exchange website appears to only allow a single lead organization. If multiple PIs are allowed, does the money get dispersed directly to all PIs?
Answer 35:

Applicants must designate a single lead organization and one individual to serve as the Principal Investigator (PI) for the SEEDS proposal.  Co-PIs from the lead organization can be listed within the proposal, and included as personnel in the SF-424a and PMC 123.1 detailed budget justification.  Costs for Co-PIs from other organizations must be included as sub-recipients in the Contractual section of the SF-424a and PMC 123.1 detailed budget justification.  DOE funding will be dispersed to the prime recipient, who is then responsible for dispersing funds to sub-recipients.

 For multi-organizational or multi-investigator projects, the project narrative must include a description of:

·         the roles and the work to be performed by each participant/investigator,

·         business agreements between the applicant and participants, and

·         how the various efforts will be integrated and managed. 

 

 

 

 

Question 36: 1) We’re using a subcontractor and their expected work is LESS than $100,000 (and less than 50% of the total work effort). Are we required to have the subcontractor submit a separate budget? 2) Also, is a budget justification for the subcontractor required, if a separate budget is not needed (Part 2 of question above)?
Answer 36:

1)      If the subawardee is expected to perform work estimated to be less than $100,000 or less than 50 percent of the total work effort, a separate budget for the subawardee will not be required  with the application for the Solar Energy Evolution and Diffusion (SEEDS) FOA.  However, if the application is selected for negotiations leading to an award, the applicant may be asked to provide additional clarification on the subawardee’s proposed costs and role in the project.

      2)      No, if a subawardee does not meet the criteria for submitting a separate       budget (expected to perform work estimated to be more than $100,000 or 50 percent of the total work effort), then a separate budget justification is not required. 

 

Question 37: We plan to submit an application for the SEEDS FOA but I have a quick question. In the FOA it states different dates for the submission deadline. I see the full application is due 10/5 and the concept paper is due 7/13. Do you have any additional information or know specifically where I could find additional information about what needs to be included in the concept paper? I can't seem to find what you would be looking for, for that section. Any information you may have would be incredibly appreciated. Thank you for your time and have a great day.
Answer 37:

In order to submit a full application for the Solar Energy Evolution and Diffusion Studies (SEEDS) FOA, potential applicants were required to submit a concept paper by July 13, 2012.  Unfortunately, if a concept paper was not submitted by the deadline, you are ineligible to apply for this FOA.

 

 

Question 38: My organization submitted a Concept Paper under Topic B of FOA 740. We're potentially interested in applying under both Topics A and B; is this restricted for any reason?
Answer 38:

Only one Full Application may be submitted per Concept Paper, however, you may expand the scope of your application beyond what was originally covered in the concept paper. 

 

 

Question 39: What is DOE’s position on contractors/subcontractors generating profit as a secondary result of work completed in support of SEEDS project activities?
Answer 39:

Per 10 CFR 600.318, grants and cooperative agreements may not provide for the payment of fee or profit to recipients or subrecipients under the SEEDS FOA.  A recipient or subrecipient under the SEEDS FOA may pay a fee or profit to a contractor providing goods or services under a contract.

 

 

Question 40: The topic that was submitted in our concept paper was listed as “General Topic”. We are interested in submitting under focus area B. Are we able to submit to this focus area?
Answer 40:

As stated in Q&A #38, you may expand the scope of your application beyond what was originally covered in the concept paper, however, only one full application may be submitted per concept paper.

  

     

Question 41: Our application has a 20% Team Member with another organization (a University). Is this 20% Team Member treated as a subawardee to the prime applicant, or is this proposal considered as a collaborative proposal, where the University submits their own proposal on EERE Exchange.
Answer 41:

Each application must designate one prime recipient.  All other organizations involved in the application, whether as subawardees or vendors, must be designated on the Contractual section of the budget submitted with the application.  The prime recipient is required to submit a separate budget (SF-424A) and budget justification (PMC 123.1) for any subawardee that is expected to perform work estimated to be more than $100,000 or 50 percent of the total work effort (whichever is less).

 

 

Question 42: 1) What Budget and Reporting code should be listed in block 5b on page one of the Field Work Proposal to be prepared for a response to this call? 2) What is the name of the program manager to be listed in block 8 on page one of the FWP to be prepared for a response to this call?
Answer 42:

1) Please contact the laboratory to obtain the budget and reporting code. 

2) The Program Manager is Minh Le.

 

 

Question 43: We plan to design the pilot program but we, as a university, have no control if the pilot program could be implemented by the industry partner or not. Could you please elaborate on the requirement for the third stage?
Answer 43:

Applications selected under Team Structure 2 should be performed in tandem with industry practitioners to ensure that results can be applied, tested, and modified in real time. In particular, each Research Team should involve public or private sector solar energy practitioners during all stages of the project who can implement and sponsor applied research activities. If a team does not incorporate an entity or entities that can design, execute, and assess a pilot program, then the team may consider applying under Team Structure 3: SunShot SEEDS Researcher.

 

 

Question 44: Our planned partner, with whom we have worked closely for years, has recently received some Sunshot support. Are there issues, however, of multiple grants to individual companies we should worry about?
Answer 44:

No, a company may receive multiple grants, however, the cost share funds provided to each grant must be different, and the DOE share of funds cannot pay for the same work (i.e., the company cannot be paid twice for the same work).

 

Question 45: Are foregone indirect costs able to be counted as part of the cost match?
Answer 45:

Indirect costs are allowable as cost share as long as the recipient has a Federally approved Indirect Rate Agreement.  If a proposal is selected for negotiation and the recipient does not have a cognizant agency, DOE will work with the recipient to establish reasonable indirect costs for the award.  For more information on indirect costs, please visit www.dcaa.mil, click on “Information for Contractors”, and review Chapter 6.

 

 

Question 46: In addition to the prime applicant, there will be two additional sub-awardees who will complete more than $100,000 worth of work for this project and who will submit budget and budget justification forms in xls format to be included in the prime applicant’s submission. We visited the EERE exchange website today and noticed that in the upload section for sub-awardees, only one sub-awardee file can be uploaded for the sub-awardee budget and budget justification. How should we upload multiple sub-awardee budget and budget justification files?
Answer 46:

Click on the “Upload Optional Files” button to upload multiple sub-awardee budgets.

 

Question 47: 1. Are foreign institutions of higher education allowed to request indirect costs? Is there a limitation on the rate that these institutions can use when calculating indirect costs? For example, the National Institutes of Health limits this rate to 8% modified total direct costs less equipment for foreign organizations. 2. Are institutions of higher education required to comply with the following: Applicant Lighting Efficiency Certification (April 2012)?
Answer 47:

1. Yes, foreign institutions of higher education are allowed to request indirect costs for sub-recipient work they perform under the SEEDS FOA.  Prime recipients are responsible for monitoring each project, program, subaward, function or activity supported by the award, however, the Contracting Officer reserves the right to require additional information and/or conduct in depth review of any project budget, cost, or fringe/indirect rate.
2. The Recipient Lighting Efficiency Certification (April 2012) applies to recipients who receive a grant in excess of one million dollars ($1M).  DOE may use grants and/or cooperative agreements as the award instrument for recipients under the SEEDS FOA (see Section II.A), so if your organization receives a grant over $1M, the certification would apply.

 

Question 48: What’s the status of selections under the SEEDS FOA? Are award announcements expected to occur in Calendar year 2012?
Answer 48:

Applications to the SEEDS FOA are still under review. DOE expects to announce awards at the end of December or early January 2013. *This date has changed please refer to answer 49*

 

 

Question 49: What’s the status of selections under the SEEDS FOA? Are award announcements expected to occur in Calendar year 2012?
Answer 49:

DOE expects to announce awards under the SEEDS FOA in late January or early February 2013.